Jul2nd

Time for the E-Gun?

AUTHOR: Kyle Giunta | IN: Uncategorized | COMMENTS: 2 Comments |

The “K-Gun”, the “No Huddle”, the “Heeerrrrre we go,” excitement palpable in Van Miller’s voice. The Glory Days.

Gone are the faces of Thomas, Kelly, and Reed; replaced by the youthful faces of Edwards, Lynch, and Evans. Though the league has changed and we have seen formations like the Wildcat mystify defenses, some offenses remain tried and true. Re-enter the “E-Gun” – the no huddle a la Edwards.

I remember sitting at training camp last year at St. John Fisher watching the scrimmages and the beauty of the no huddle unfolding before my eyes. I also recall the epic periods of stagnant offense throughout the season and screaming at Jauron for a spark. Now I know that the no huddle isn’t as easy as Peyton might make it look, but let’s weigh the pros and cons.

Pros: Trent and his receivers (minus TO) are in their third year working together and by now it is time to put the mutual understandings of body language, route running, and trust to the test. Trent has shown that he is a leader and must step up to the responsibility that comes along with being a third-year QB in the NFL. Edwards has also demonstrated a desire to improve, both on the field with extra workouts and in the film room. It is this work ethic and Stanford-IQ that could allow the Bills to exploit mismatches in coverage if the no huddle could be run effectively. This will also give receivers like Owens and Parrish the opportunity to exploit their strengths – Owens as a veteran and Parrish with his blistering speed.

Cons: My number one concern is for even shorter breaks for the defense. The Bills finished 25th in total offense last year – highlighted by too many three-and-outs. There is no question that the majority of losses last year came not just because of a lack in scoring, but also because of defensive fatigue setting in late in the game. If the Bills are to succeed this year they are going to have to find a way to tip that balance. While the no huddle can provide quick points, it can also quickly evaporate time of possession.

There is no question that the no huddle can be a valuable asset for the 2009 Bills though it will need some strategic implementation, will require confidence in the players on the field, and room for growing pains. At this point, our Cardiac Bills need a defibrillator. The “E-Gun” might provide just the shock needed to re-instill some life in the Bills’ potentially potent offense.

2 Comments on Time for the E-Gun?

  1. blitzboy54 says:

    The K-gun was not named after Jim Kelly, it was named after Keith McKeller. The tight end is the key to the no huddle. So it would be the D or S gun. For either of the Derricks or Shawn Nelson.

    Everyone thinks it has to do with Kelly.

    • Kyle Giunta says:

      Blitz, thanks for the comment. There certainly seems to be a lot of confusion in the Bills world as to the origin of the “K-Gun”. Many accounts attribute it to Kelly while some credit McKeller. I, for one, would love to settle this issue. If you have some concrete history for us and a source please share! Either way, there is no question that TE has been a sore spot in Buffalo for some time now so Schouman, Fine, or Nelson are going to have to step up. Agreed. Bottom line, however, is this has to be the year of Trent in many key ways. He’s going to be the one who needs to make the progressions and solid decisions … it sure would be nice to have a TE to look to though!

Join The Discussion